Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Ultrasound Med. 2009 May;28(5):617-29.

Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used?

Author information

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel. nirm@clalit.org.il

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of different sonographic models for fetal weight estimation.

METHODS:

We evaluated 26 different models using 3705 sonographic weight estimations performed less than 3 days before delivery. Models were ranked on the basis of systematic and random errors and were grouped according to the combination of biometric indices in each model. Cluster analysis was used to compare the accuracy of the different model groups.

RESULTS:

A considerable variation in the accuracy of the different models was found. For birth weights (BWs) in the range of 1000 to 4500 g, models based on 3 or 4 fetal biometric indices were significantly more accurate than models that incorporated only 1 or 2 indices. The accuracy of weight estimation decreased at the extremes of BWs, leading to overestimation in low-BW categories as opposed to underestimation when the BW exceeded 4000 g. The precision of most models was lowest in the low-BW groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

To improve the accuracy of fetal weight estimation, sonographic models that are based on 3 or 4 fetal biometric indices should be preferred. Recognizing the accuracy and the tendency for underestimation or overestimation of each of the available models is important for the judicious interpretation of fetal weight estimations, especially at the extremes of fetal weight.

PMID:
19389901
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk