Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5192. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

    From traditional medicine to witchcraft: why medical treatments are not always efficacious.

    Source

    Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biotechnology & Biomolecular Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. m.tanaka@unsw.edu.au

    Abstract

    Complementary medicines, traditional remedies and home cures for medical ailments are used extensively world-wide, representing more than US$60 billion sales in the global market. With serious doubts about the efficacy and safety of many treatments, the industry remains steeped in controversy. Little is known about factors affecting the prevalence of efficacious and non-efficacious self-medicative treatments. Here we develop mathematical models which reveal that the most efficacious treatments are not necessarily those most likely to spread. Indeed, purely superstitious remedies, or even maladaptive practices, spread more readily than efficacious treatments under specified circumstances. Low-efficacy practices sometimes spread because their very ineffectiveness results in longer, more salient demonstration and a larger number of converts, which more than compensates for greater rates of abandonment. These models also illuminate a broader range of phenomena, including the spread of innovations, medical treatment of animals, foraging behaviour, and self-medication in non-human primates.

    PMID:
    19367333
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2664922
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (6) Free text

    Figure 2
    Figure 1
    Figure 4
    Figure 6
    Figure 5
    Figure 3

      Supplemental Content

      Click here to read Click here to read

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk