Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Laryngorhinootologie. 2009 May;88 Suppl 1:S64-75. Epub 2009 Apr 7.

    [Biomaterials in reconstructive skull base surgery].

    [Article in German]

    Source

    Universitäts-Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg. maier@hno.ukl.uni-freiburg.de

    Abstract

    Reconstruction materials and techniques for the skull base have undergone rapid developments and differentiation in recent years. While mostly autotransplants, collagens or resorbable alloplastic materials are preferred for duraplasties, pronounced organ-specific differences can be observed IN the reconstruction of hard tissues. The use of polymethylmethacryl bone cement, once wide-spread, has decreased greatly due to the release of toxic monomers. Bony autotransplants are still used primarily for smaller skull-base defects, intraoperatively formable titanium meshes may be also used for larger fronto- or laterobasal reconstructions of bony defects. Defects in visible areas are increasingly closed with preformed titanium or ceramic implants, which are planned and fitted to the individual patient using preoperative CT imaging. At the skull base, this applies especially to reconstructions of the frontal sinus. For extensive reconstructions of the orbita, titanium meshes and non-resorbable plastics have proven valuable, in closing smaller defects especially of the orbital floor, resorbable implants based on Polyglactin 901 are also used.

    PMID:
    19353459
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk