Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):702-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.038.

Comparison of night driving performance after wavefront-guided and conventional LASIK for moderate myopia.

Author information

  • 1The Navy Refractive Surgery Center, Naval Medical Center, San Diego, California, USA. scschallhorn@yahoo.com

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare preoperative and postoperative changes in simulated night driving performance after wavefront-guided (wLASIK) and conventional LASIK (cLASIK) for the treatment of moderate myopia.

DESIGN:

Retrospective, comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS:

All eyes of subjects with a preoperative manifest spherical equivalent (MSE) between -4.50 and -6.00 who underwent night driving simulator (NDS) testing from 2 clinical trials were entered into the study. This comprised 38 cLASIK patients (62 eyes; mean -5.46 diopters [D] MSE) and 21 wLASIK patients (36 eyes, mean -5.20 D MSE).

METHODS:

Patients' records were reviewed from 2 LASIK clinical trials that had similar enrollment criteria. One trial treated patients with conventional LASIK using a bladed microkeratome (cLASIK) and the other treated with a wavefront-guided profile using a femtosecond laser (wLASIK). In both trials, patients with moderate myopia were asked to participate in NDS testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The detection and identification distances of road hazards were measured with and without a glare source before and 6 months after LASIK. Each eye was tested independently in best-corrected trial frames by a masked operator.

RESULTS:

In every category, there was a mean reduction in the preoperative to postoperative NDS performance after cLASIK (mean change, -21.3 to -27.9 ft, -6.5 to -8.5 m; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.0 to -41.3 ft, -3.7 to -12.6 m); there was a corresponding mean improvement after wLASIK (mean change +15.0 to +29.1 ft, +4.6 to +8.9 m; 95% CI, +8.3 to +41.5 ft, +2.5 to +12.6 m). Significant differences between cLASIK and wLASIK NDS performance was observed in every category (P<0.;01, Tukey's honest significant difference for unequal numbers). A clinical relevant loss of NDS performance (>0.5 seconds) was observed in 32% to 38% of cLASIK eyes for all tasks, whereas only 0% to 3% of eyes had this loss after wLASIK. Between 2% and 7% of cLASIK eyes and 11% and 31% of eyes had a significant postoperative improvement in NDS performance in every task.

CONCLUSIONS:

Wavefront-guided LASIK to correct myopia combined with a femtosecond laser flap significantly improved mean night driving visual performance and was significantly better than cLASIK using a mechanical keratome.

Comment in

  • Night driving after LASIK. [Ophthalmology. 2009]
PMID:
19344822
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk