Example of positive and negative design states: schematic of competing states included in the design of ligand binding-induced allosteric changes ((
a) open conformation, no binding; (
b) open conformation with binding; (
c) aggregated state; (
d) closed conformation, no binding ligand; (
e) closed conformation with binding; (
f) unfolded state and ligand). The optimization has to consider two target states corresponding to the two desired conformations (
a,
e), guaranteeing stability of the open and closed conformations. Competing structures are included for stability (
f), sensitivity (
d), affinity (
b) and solubility (
c), and we will have to maximize their free energies simultaneously. The energies to minimize are

and

.

reflects the probability of the ligand binding and not inducing the corresponding conformational change.

reflects the probability of the conformational transition taking place in the absence of the ligand. The probability that a designed protein will adopt the target state is given by

.