Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose of thoracic and coronary dual-source CT in 110 infants with congenital heart disease

Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Jul;39(7):668-76. doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1209-6. Epub 2009 Mar 25.

Abstract

Background: There are only a few reports on the diagnostic accuracy, and the technical and clinical feasibility, of multidetector CT (MDCT) in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD).

Objective: To evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of DSCT in babies with CHD.

Materials and methods: From November 2006 to November 2007, 110 consecutive infants with CHD referred for pre- or postoperative CT evaluation were included. All these infants had a spiral angiothoracic DSCT scan after injection of 300 mg/ml iopromide at 0.5-1 ml/s with a power injector using a low-dose protocol (80 kVp and 10 mAs/kg). Of these infants, 34 also underwent an ECG-gated coronary CT scan for evaluation of the course of the coronary arteries.

Results: No serious adverse events were recorded. The mean dose-length product was 8+/-6 mGy x cm (effective dose 0.5+/-0.2 mSv) and 21+/-9 mGy x cm (effective dose 1.3+/-0.6 mSv) during the non-ECG-gated spiral acquisition and ECG-gated acquisition, respectively. Diagnostic quality images were achieved with the spiral acquisition in 89% of cases. Compared to the spiral mode, ECG-gated acquisition significantly improved the visualization of the coronary arteries, with a diagnostic rate of 91% and 84% for the left and right coronary arteries, respectively.

Conclusion: DSCT together with iopromide at 300 mg/ml is a valuable tool for the routine clinical evaluation of infants with CHD. ECG-gated acquisition provides reliable visualization of the course of the coronary arteries.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Body Burden*
  • Coronary Angiography / methods*
  • Female
  • Heart Defects, Congenital / diagnostic imaging*
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Radiographic Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Radiography, Thoracic / methods*
  • Relative Biological Effectiveness
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*