Do surgical personnel really need to double-glove?

AORN J. 2009 Feb;89(2):322-8; quiz 329-32. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.11.001.

Abstract

In 2007, AORN's Recommended Practices Task Force revised the "Recommended practices on prevention of transmissible infections in the perioperative practice setting" to recommend that health care practitioners double-glove during invasive procedures. Previously, AORN had suggested that wearing two pairs of gloves might be indicated for some procedures. Research on the protective effects of double gloving provides compelling evidence that surgical personnel should double-glove during all surgical procedures. Statistics on unreported injuries and conversion rates of HIV and hepatitis B indicate that change is difficult; however, research also suggests that objections to double-gloving can be overcome and a practice change implemented to ensure the safety of health care workers and patients alike.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Accidents, Occupational / prevention & control*
  • Equipment Failure
  • Ergonomics
  • Evidence-Based Practice
  • Gloves, Surgical* / standards
  • Gloves, Surgical* / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infection Control / methods*
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / prevention & control
  • Materials Testing
  • Needlestick Injuries / prevention & control*
  • Nurse's Role
  • Occupational Health
  • Operating Room Nursing* / methods
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Risk Factors
  • Societies, Nursing
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Time Factors
  • United States