Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Jun;42(3):413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies.

Author information

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, VC-5, New York, NY 10032, USA. Katie.Zhu@dbmi.columbia.edu

Abstract

Although controlled biomedical terminologies have been with us for centuries, it is only in the last couple of decades that close attention has been paid to the quality of these terminologies. The result of this attention has been the development of auditing methods that apply formal methods to assessing whether terminologies are complete and accurate. We have performed an extensive literature review to identify published descriptions of these methods and have created a framework for characterizing them. The framework considers manual, systematic and heuristic methods that use knowledge (within or external to the terminology) to measure quality factors of different aspects of the terminology content (terms, semantic classification, and semantic relationships). The quality factors examined included concept orientation, consistency, non-redundancy, soundness and comprehensive coverage. We reviewed 130 studies that were retrieved based on keyword search on publications in PubMed, and present our assessment of how they fit into our framework. We also identify which terminologies have been audited with the methods and provide examples to illustrate each part of the framework.

PMID:
19285571
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3505841
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk