Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Law Hum Behav. 2010 Aug;34(4):259-74. Epub 2009 Mar 11.

    Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: a challenge for forensic practice.

    Source

    Department of Psychology, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK. djcooke@rgardens.vianw.co.uk

    Abstract

    Knowledge of group tendencies may not assist accurate predictions in the individual case. This has importance for forensic decision making and for the assessment tools routinely applied in forensic evaluations. In this article, we applied Monte Carlo methods to examine diagnostic agreement with different levels of inter-rater agreement given the distributional characteristics of PCL-R scores. Diagnostic agreement and score agreement were substantially less than expected. In addition, we examined the confidence intervals associated with individual predictions of violent recidivism. On the basis of empirical findings, statistical theory, and logic, we conclude that predictions of future offending cannot be achieved in the individual case with any degree of confidence. We discuss the problems identified in relation to the PCL-R in terms of the broader relevance to all instruments used in forensic decision making.

    PMID:
    19277854
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Springer

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk