Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2244-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations.
Adams H, Ahmad HA, Albers G, Altman HJ, Aronowski J, Atkinson RP, Barman NC, Boltze J, Bornstein NM, Broderick J, Caggiano AO, Chavez JC, Chen CP, Cramer S, Dalsgaard MK, Díez-Tejedor E, Dunn B, Enney LA, Fasciano R, Finklestein SP, Ford BD, Fuentes B, Gleeson M, Goldstein LB, Gounis MJ, Gwag BJ, Hachinski V, Hanley DF, Henninger N, Hess DC, Howard G, Howells D, Hurn PD, Iaci JF, Jacobs T, Johnson K, Kent TA, Khatri P, Kidwell CS, Kissela B, Koroshetz WJ, Lee TL, Lees KR, Levy DE, Liebeskind DS, Lorenzo JL, Lyden PD, Lynch JK, Macleod MR, Majid A, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Mcilroy BW, Miller CG, Moonis M, Moessler H, Murayama S, Nikolich K, Pangalos MN, Perera P, Rumm P, Sacco RL, Saver JL, Schäbitz WR, Schenck JF, Schneider A, Schneider D, Spilker JA, Singhal AB, Smith W, Solberg Y, Streeter J, Torup L, Wagner DC, Wakhloo A, Walkinshaw G, Walton M, Wintermark M, Zaleska MM, Zivin JA.
Source
Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. fisherm@ummhc.org
Abstract
The initial Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) recommendations published in 1999 were intended to improve the quality of preclinical studies of purported acute stroke therapies. Although recognized as reasonable, they have not been closely followed nor rigorously validated. Substantial advances have occurred regarding the appropriate quality and breadth of preclinical testing for candidate acute stroke therapies for better clinical translation. The updated STAIR preclinical recommendations reinforce the previous suggestions that reproducibly defining dose response and time windows with both histological and functional outcomes in multiple animal species with appropriate physiological monitoring is appropriate. The updated STAIR recommendations include: the fundamentals of good scientific inquiry should be followed by eliminating randomization and assessment bias, a priori defining inclusion/exclusion criteria, performing appropriate power and sample size calculations, and disclosing potential conflicts of interest. After initial evaluations in young, healthy male animals, further studies should be performed in females, aged animals, and animals with comorbid conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia. Another consideration is the use of clinically relevant biomarkers in animal studies. Although the recommendations cannot be validated until effective therapies based on them emerge from clinical trials, it is hoped that adherence to them might enhance the chances for success.
- PMID:
- 19246690
- [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
- PMCID:
- PMC2888275
Free PMC ArticlePublication Types
MeSH Terms
Grant Support
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical