Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008:727505. doi: 10.1155/2008/727505. Epub 2009 Feb 5.

    Antibiotic resistance patterns in invasive group B streptococcal isolates.

    Source

    Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Prevention and Control Division, Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, MN 55164, USA.

    Abstract

    Antibiotics are used for both group B streptococcal (GBS) prevention and treatment. Active population-based surveillance for invasive GBS disease was conducted in four states during 1996-2003. Of 3813 case-isolates, 91.0% (3471) were serotyped, 77.1% (2937) had susceptibility testing, and 46.6% (3471) had both. All were sensitive to penicillin, ampicillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin. Clindamycin and erythromycin resistance was 12.7% and 25.6%, respectively, and associated with serotype V (P < .001). Clindamycin resistance increased from 10.5% to 15.0% (X(2) for trend 12.70; P < .001); inducible clindamycin resistance was associated with the erm genotype. Erythromycin resistance increased from 15.8% to 32.8% (X(2) for trend 55.46; P < .001). While GBS remains susceptible to beta-lactams, resistance to alternative agents such as erythromycin and clindamycin is an increasing concern.

    PMID:
    19223967
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2637368
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (3)Free text

    Figure 1
    Figure 2
    Figure 3

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Hindawi Publishing Corporation Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk