Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Apr;57(4):594-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02167.x. Epub 2009 Feb 9.

A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. smitg@mayo.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the efficacy of a novel brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program in older adults and to evaluate the effect on untrained measures of memory and attention and participant-reported outcomes.

DESIGN:

Multisite randomized controlled double-blind trial with two treatment groups.

SETTING:

Communities in northern and southern California and Minnesota.

PARTICIPANTS:

Community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (N=487) without a diagnosis of clinically significant cognitive impairment.

INTERVENTION:

Participants were randomized to receive a broadly-available brain plasticity-based computerized cognitive training program (intervention) or a novelty- and intensity-matched general cognitive stimulation program modeling treatment as usual (active control). Duration of training was 1 hour per day, 5 days per week, for 8 weeks, for a total of 40 hours.

MEASUREMENTS:

The primary outcome was a composite score calculated from six subtests of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status that use the auditory modality (RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention). Secondary measures were derived from performance on the experimental program, standardized neuropsychological assessments of memory and attention, and participant-reported outcomes.

RESULTS:

RBANS Auditory Memory/Attention improvement was significantly greater (P=.02) in the experimental group (3.9 points, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.7-5.1) than in the control group (1.8 points, 95% CI=0.6-3.0). Multiple secondary measures of memory and attention showed significantly greater improvements in the experimental group (word list total score, word list delayed recall, digits backwards, letter-number sequencing; P<.05), as did the participant-reported outcome measure (P=.001). No advantage for the experimental group was seen in narrative memory.

CONCLUSION:

The experimental program improved generalized measures of memory and attention more than an active control program.

PMID:
19220558
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC4169294
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk