Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Feb;197(2):104-10. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e318192416f.

A comparison of contextual and biomedical models of stigma reduction for depression with a nonclinical undergraduate sample.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA.

Abstract

Stigma reduction programs are dominated by a biomedical model that presents depression as a medical illness. Alternately, a contextual model emphasizes that one should not be blamed for environmental influences. This study compared biomedical, contextual, and control stigma reduction programs to each other and to a no-program control. The main hypotheses were that the contextual program would have the greatest impact and that a match between participants' beliefs about depression and the model presented would moderate this effect. Seventy-four participants were randomized to the 3 programs and 12 participants served as a no-program control. The contextual and control programs reduced stigma significantly compared with the no-program control, whereas the biomedical program did not. Beliefs about depression moderated this effect only for the biomedical condition. Contextual and control programs seem to be effective but a biomedical model may be risky for those who disagree with the model. Theoretical implications are discussed.

PMID:
19214045
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk