Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 May;296(5):R1316-24. Epub 2009 Feb 11.

    Reappraisal of the intravenous glucose tolerance index for a simple assessment of insulin sensitivity in mice.

    Source

    Metabolic Unit, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Research Council, Padova, Italy. giovanni.pacini@isib.cnr.it

    Abstract

    Mice are increasingly used in studies where measuring insulin sensitivity (IS) is a common procedure. The glucose clamp is labor intensive, cannot be used in large numbers of animals, cannot be repeated in the same mouse, and has been questioned as a valid tool for IS in mice; thus, the minimal model with 50-min intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data was adapted for studies in mice. However, specific software and particular ability was needed. The aim of this study was to establish a simple procedure for evaluating IS during IVGTT in mice (CS(I)). IVGTTs (n = 520) were performed in NMRI and C57BL/6J mice (20-25g). After glucose injection (1 g/kg), seven samples were collected for 50 min for glucose and insulin measurements, analyzed with a minimal model that provided the validated reference IS (S(I)). By using the regression CS(I) = alpha(1) + alpha(2) x K(G)/AUC(D), where K(G) is intravenous glucose tolerance index and AUC(d) is the dynamic area under the curve, IS was calculated in 134 control animals randomly selected (regression CS(I) vs. S(I): r = 0.66, P < 0.0001) and yielded alpha(1) = 1.93 and alpha(2) = 0.24. K(G) is the slope of log (glucose(5-20)) and AUC(D) is the mean dynamic area under insulin curve in the IVGTT. By keeping fixed alpha(1) and alpha(2), CS(I) was validated in 143 control mice (4.7 +/- 0.2 min*microU(-1)*ml(-1), virtually identical to S(I): 4.7 +/- 0.3, r = 0.89, P < 0.0001); and in 123 mice in different conditions: transgenic, addition of neuropeptides, incretins, and insulin (CS(I): 6.0 +/- 0.4 vs. S(I): 6.1 +/- 0.4, r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). In the other 120 animals, CS(I) revealed its ability to segregate different categories, as does S(I). This easily usable formula for calculating CS(I) overcomes many experimental obstacles and may be a simple alternative to more complex procedures when large numbers of mice or repeated experiments in the same animals are required.

    PMID:
    19211728
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk