Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
PLoS Med. 2009 Feb 3;6(2):e23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023.

What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?

Author information

  • 1Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark. pcg@cochrane.dk

Abstract

BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE:

Ghostwriting occurs when someone makes substantial contributions to a manuscript without attribution or disclosure. It is considered bad publication practice in the medical sciences, and some argue it is scientific misconduct. At its extreme, medical ghostwriting involves pharmaceutical companies hiring professional writers to produce papers promoting their products but hiding those contributions and instead naming academic physicians or scientists as the authors. To improve transparency, many editors' associations and journals allow professional medical writers to contribute to the writing of papers without being listed as authors provided their role is acknowledged. This debate examines how best to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature from the perspectives of a researcher, an editor, and the professional medical writer.

PMID:
19192943
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2634793
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk