Comparison of HNF-1α occupancy in different platforms.
A: Venn diagrams depicting HNF-1α–bound genes in mouse BCBC arrays versus human and mouse Agilent arrays from Odom et al. (8). We analyzed 2,150 genes with data in both platforms. Note that Agilent arrays cover 10-Kb surrounding transcription start sites, whereas BCBC arrays cover 1- to 2-Kb 5′ flanking regions, and thus complete binding overlap is not expected.
B: Concordance of HNF-1α occupancy in mouse BCBC arrays at different Log2 binding ratio thresholds (M >1, >0.8, and >0.6;
P < 0.001) with that in Agilent arrays expressed as the fold increase over the random expectation. Statistical significance was calculated with the hypergeometric distribution. ***
P < 0.0001, #
P < 0.05, only values for overrepresented classes are shown.
C: Volcano plot of HNF1 binding ratios for all probes in mouse BCBC arrays (

) and for genes classified as human-specific binding events using either default or stringent criteria in the report by Odom et al. (8) (● and ○). The results show that 15–37% of genes classified as human-specific HNF1α targets are bound in mouse BCBC arrays using low or moderate stringency criteria. Dashed and dotted lines depict lenient and stringent binding criteria in the BCBC arrays. IP, immunoprecipitate.