Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    BMC Med Phys. 2009 Jan 29;9:2.

    Repeatability of regional myocardial blood flow calculation in 82Rb PET imaging.

    Source

    Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Mount Sinai Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA. karin.knesaurek@mssm.edu

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    We evaluated the repeatability of the calculation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and pharmacological stress, and calculated the coronary flow reserve (CFR) utilizing 82Rb PET imaging. The aim of the research was to prove high repeatability for global MBF and CFR values and good repeatability for regional MBF and CFR values. The results will have significant impact on cardiac PET imaging in terms of making it more affordable and increasing its use.

    METHODS:

    12 normal volunteers were imaged at rest and during pharmacological stress, with 2220 MBq of 82Rb each. A GE Advance PET system was used to acquire dynamic 50-frame studies. MBF was calculated with a 2-compartmental model using a modified PMOD program (PMOD; University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland). Two differential equations, describing a 2-compartmental model, were solved by numerical integration and using Levenberg-Marquardt's method for fitting data. The PMOD program defines 16 standard segments and calculates myocardial flow for each segment, as well as average septal, anterior, lateral, inferior and global flow. Repeatability was evaluated according to the method of Bland and Altman.

    RESULTS:

    Global rest and stress MBF, as well as global CFR, showed very good repeatability. No significant differences were found between the paired resting global MBF (0.63 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.13 mL/min/g; mean difference, -1.0% +/- 2.6%) and the stress global MBF (1.37 +/- 0.23 vs. 1.37 +/- 0.24; mean difference, 0.1% +/- 2.3%). Global CFR was highly reproducible (2.25 +/- 0.56 vs. 2.22 +/- 0.54, P = not statistically significant; mean difference, 1.3% +/- 14.3%). Repeatability coefficients for global rest MBF were 0.033 (5.2%) and stress MBF 0.062 (4.5%) mL/min/g. Regional rest and stress MBF and CFR have shown good reproducibility. The average per sector repeatability coefficients for rest MBF were 0.056 (8.5%) and stress MBF 0.089 (6.3%) mL/min/g, and average repeatability coefficient for CFR was 0.25 (10.6%).

    CONCLUSION:

    The results of the study show that software calculation of MBF and CFR with 82Rb myocardial PET imaging is highly repeatable for global values and has good repeatability for regional values.

    PMID:
    19178700
    [PubMed]
    PMCID:
    PMC2646684
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (6) Free text

    Figure 2
    Figure 4
    Figure 6
    Figure 1
    Figure 3
    Figure 5

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk