Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Feb;60(2):250-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.60.2.250.

Initial evaluation of the Peer-to-Peer program.

Author information

  • 1Center for Mental Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, 737 West Lombard St., Room 258, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. aluckste@psych.umaryland.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Peer-to-Peer, sponsored by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), is a structured, experiential, self-empowerment, relapse prevention and wellness program led by trained peer mentors for people with mental illnesses. The authors conducted the first empirical evaluation of the program by using a pre-post survey design.

METHODS:

Approximately 550 participants who were enrolled in Peer-to-Peer during the data collection period (2005-2006) were invited to complete a brief, anonymous survey before participating in the program and immediately after.

RESULTS:

Analyses of responses from 138 participants indicated that they gained significant benefits, especially in areas central to the Peer-to-Peer curriculum--specifically, knowledge and management of their illness, feelings of being less powerless and more confident, connection with others, and completion of an advance directive. Qualitative analysis of responses to an open-ended postintervention question supported the quantitative findings.

CONCLUSIONS:

Peer-to-Peer is a promising self-help modality that warrants additional evaluation with more rigorous methodology.

PMID:
19176421
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk