Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Eat Disord. 2009 Sep;42(6):546-51. doi: 10.1002/eat.20645.

Effect of perceived anonymity in assessments of eating disordered behaviors and attitudes.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222, USA. jl979833@albany.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The present study assessed the effect of perceived anonymity on endorsements of eating disordered behaviors and attitudes across multiple response formats.

METHOD:

Four hundred sixty-nine undergraduate women responded using one of three questionnaire formats: a nominally anonymous true/false condition, an unmatched count condition, or a randomized-response condition. Both the unmatched count and randomized response conditions provided complete response anonymity.

RESULTS:

Significantly different endorsement rates were found for the majority of items when comparing the standard and unmatched count conditions, whereas differences were found for fewer items when comparing the standard and randomized response conditions. Perceived anonymity significantly differed across conditions, with the highest and lowest perceptions of anonymity found for the unmatched count and standard conditions, respectively.

DISCUSSION:

Perceived anonymity and response format affect endorsements of eating disordered behaviors and attitudes, highlighting the necessity of understanding factors that contribute to response bias.

PMID:
19172594
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk