Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):756-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033. Epub 2009 Jan 6.

Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness.

Author information

  • 1Clinical Trials Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. max.parkin@ctsu.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The completeness of cancer registry data -- the extent to which all of the incident cancers occurring in the population are included in the registry database -- is an extremely important attribute of a cancer registry. Only a high degree of completeness in case-finding procedures will ensure cancer incidence rates and survival proportions are close to their true value. This second instalment of a two-part review of data quality methods at the cancer registry, focuses on the principles and techniques available for estimating completeness, separating methods into those that are semi-quantitative -- in that they give an indication of the degree of completeness relative to other registries or over time, and more quantitative techniques -- those that provide a numerical evaluation of the extent to which all eligible cases have been registered.

PMID:
19128954
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk