Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Public Health (Oxf). 2009 Mar;31(1):127-30. Epub 2008 Dec 22.

    The advantages of being called NICE: a systematic review of journal article titles using the acronym for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

    Source

    West of Scotland Cancer Surveillance Unit, Division of Community Based Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8DN, UK. d.s.morrison@clinmed.gla.ac.uk

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    To describe the use of NICE, the acronym for the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, as both an adjective and noun in peer-reviewed journal article titles.

    DESIGN:

    Systematic review of titles retrieved by electronic database searches.

    DATA SOURCES:

    Ovid databases (MEDLINE, All EBM Reviews, EMBASE, ERIC, CINAHL and PsycINFO) covering the formation of NICE in 1999 to February 2008.

    REVIEW METHODS:

    Independent review of eligible titles by both authors and resolution of disagreements based on consideration of full text articles.

    RESULTS:

    2274 articles were retrieved that included reference to NICE in their titles. Of these, 167 (7.3%) used NICE as an adjective, most commonly in conjunction with the terms 'work', 'not so' (NICE), 'nasty', 'mess' and 'try'.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    The work of NICE has been widely referenced in peer-reviewed journal article titles, sometimes with apparent humorous intent when used as an adjective. Well-chosen names may increase the recognizability of public health organizations and help to communicate their roles.

    PMID:
    19103656
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free full text

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk