Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):855-64. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.042. Epub 2008 Nov 30.

A prospective, comparative analysis of anti-Müllerian hormone, inhibin-B, and three-dimensional ultrasound determinants of ovarian reserve in the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian stimulation.

Author information

  • 1Nottingham University Research and Treatment Unit in Reproduction, Division of Human Development, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. jayaprakasan@hotmail.co.uk

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare three-dimensional ultrasound parameters, antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume, and ovarian vascularity indices with anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and other conventional endocrine markers for the prediction of poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) during assisted reproduction treatment (ART).

DESIGN:

Prospective study.

SETTING:

University-based assisted conception unit.

PATIENT(S):

One hundred thirty-five women undergoing the first cycle of ART.

INTERVENTION(S):

Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound assessment and venipuncture in the early follicular phase of the menstrual cycle immediately before ART.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):

Poor ovarian response and nonconception.

RESULT(S):

Antral follicle count (Exp(B): 0.65) and AMH (Exp(B): 0.13) were the most significant predictors of poor ovarian response on multiple regression analysis and their predictive accuracy was similar, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.935 and 0.905, respectively. The AFC and AMH, as a combined test, did not significantly improve the level of prediction (AUC = 0.946). The sensitivity and specificity for prediction of poor ovarian response were 93% and 88% for AFC and 100% and 73% for AMH at an optimum cutoff values of < or =10 and < or =0.99 ng/mL, respectively. Age (Exp(B): 1.191) was the only significant predictor of nonconception, although its predictive accuracy was also low (AUC = 0.674).

CONCLUSION(S):

The AFC and AMH are the most significant predictors of poor response to ovarian stimulation during ART. The AMH and AFC, either alone or in combination, demonstrate a similar predictive power but are not predictive of nonconception, which is dependent on the woman's age.

Copyright 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
19046583
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk