Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare test positivity rates of liquid-based and conventional cytology.

METHODS:

This study was a cluster randomized controlled trial with family practice as the unit of randomization, performed within the Dutch national cervical screening program. Women aged 30-60 years (n=89,784) recruited from 246 family practices were included. One-hundred twenty-two practices (49,222 individuals) were randomly assigned to the experimental arm, and 124 practices (40,562 participants), to the conventional arm. Inclusion was performed during a 3-year period between April 2003 and July 2006. Cytologic test positivity rates of liquid-based compared with conventional cytology was compared in terms of crude and adjusted odds ratios, applying a per-protocol analysis.

RESULTS:

Crude ratios of the odds of test positivity rates of liquid-based compared with conventional cytology for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or more severe, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or more severe, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or more severe were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-1.10), 1.00 (95% CI 0.83-1.20), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.77-1.22), respectively. Liquid-based cytology resulted in fewer unsatisfactory tests (odds ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.23-0.38). The results did not change when the odds ratios were adjusted for age, study site, study period, and urbanization level. Of 128 women screened with liquid-based cytology, one unsatisfactory preparation is avoided.

CONCLUSION:

This study found no statistically significant difference in cytologic test positivity rates between liquid-based and conventional cytology. However, liquid-based cytology resulted in significantly fewer unsatisfactory tests.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:

Nederlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl, NTR1032

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

I.