Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):1897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.071.

Prevention of sternal dehiscence and infection in high-risk patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

Author information

  • 1Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Klinik für Thorax-, Herz- und Thorakale Gefäbchirurgie, Würzburg, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

One factor for the development of sternal wound infection (SWI) is bony instability after sternotomy. This study compares two surgical techniques with respect to the occurrence of SWI in patients with an increased risk.

METHODS:

In this multicenter study, 815 consecutive patients with an increased risk for SWI were prospectively randomly assigned to a conventional osteosynthesis (transsternal or peristernal wiring; n = 440) or to an osteosynthesis with additional lateral reinforcement (Robicsek; n = 375). Primary endpoints were the rate of sternal dehiscence as well as the occurrence of superficial sternal wound infections and deep sternal wound infections.

RESULTS:

Both groups were comparable concerning preoperative and intraoperative variables. The rate of sternal dehiscence, superficial sternal wound infections, and deep sternal wound infections (conventional technique 2.5%, 3.4%, 2.5%; and Robicsek 3.7%, 5.6%, 3.7%) did not differ between the groups. Logistic regression analysis found independent risk factors for the development of sternal dehiscence: body mass indes greater than 30 kg/m(2) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.9; p = 0.05), New York Heart Association class more than III (OR: 2.4; p = 0.07), impaired renal function (OR: 3.9; p = 0.01), peripheral arterial disease (OR: 3.6; p = 0.001), immunosuppressant state (OR: 3.3; p = 0.001), sternal closure performed by an assistant doctor (OR: 2.5, p = 0.004), postoperative bleeding (OR: 4.2; p = 0.03), transfusion of more than 5 red blood units (OR: 3.7, p = 0.01), reexploration for bleeding (OR: 6.9, p = 0.001), and postoperative delirium (OR: 3.5, p = 0.01). There was an inverse relation between the numbers of wires and DSWI in patients with conventional sternal closure (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with an increased risk for sternal instability and wound infection after cardiac surgery, sternal reinforcement according to the technique described by Robicsek did not reduce this complication.

Comment in

PMID:
19022005
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk