Comparative analysis of fecal fat quantitation via nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR) and gravimetry

Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Feb;400(1-2):33-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.10.001. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

Abstract

Background: Fecal-fat is typically measured by extracting lipid from homogenized feces with subsequent gravimetric/titrimetric analyses that are time-consuming and involve toxic solvents. Accordingly, an efficient and more safe method to quantitate fecal-fat is needed. The present objective was to adapt CEM SmartTrac technology (i.e. (1)H NMR) to rapidly (< 5 min) quantitate fecal-fat and compare (1)H NMR and gravimetric performance characteristics.

Methods: (1)H NMR and gravimetric measurements of stool-fat were conducted using excess stool samples (72 h collection; n=107) homogenized to semi-liquid consistency prior to analyses.

Results: The (1)H NMR method demonstrated acceptable linearity (R(2)=0.9999) and recovery (mean=105%) with imprecision (intra-assay CV=1.2-6.5%; inter-assay CV=1.8-5.8%) comparable to or better than gravimetry (intra-assay CV=1.0-17.2%; inter-assay CV=3.8-6.5%). Excellent correlation between fecal-fat quantitation by (1)H NMR and gravimetry (n=107; R(2)=0.983; y=1.0173x-0.6859) was exhibited; moreover, (1)H NMR demonstrated good sensitivity (92.3%), specificity (94.5%), negative-predictive value (92.9%) and positive-predictive value (94.1%) for malabsorption using the reference cut-off of < or = 7 g fat/24 h.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that (1)H NMR permits rapid and safe quantitation of fecal-fat while maintaining acceptable performance characteristics, thereby supporting the utility of (1)H NMR as an alternative method to gravimetry for fecal-fat quantitation.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques
  • Feces / chemistry*
  • Gravitation
  • Humans
  • Linear Models
  • Lipids / analysis*
  • Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Titrimetry

Substances

  • Lipids