Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Trauma Stress. 2008 Oct;21(5):433-9. doi: 10.1002/jts.20367.

Noninferiority and equivalence designs: issues and implications for mental health research.

Author information

  • 1National Center for PTSD-Pacific Islands Division, of Veterans Affairs Pacific Islands Healthcare System, Honolulu, HI 96819, USA. Carolyn.Greene3@va.gov

Abstract

The terms noninferiority and equivalence are often used interchangeably to refer to trials in which the primary objective is to show that a novel intervention is as effective as the standard intervention. The use of these designs is becoming increasingly relevant to mental health research. Despite the fundamental importance of these designs, they are often poorly understood, improperly applied, and subsequently misinterpreted. In this article, the authors explain noninferiority and equivalence designs and key methodological and statistical considerations. Decision points in using these designs are discussed, such as choice of control condition, determination of the noninferiority margin, and calculation of sample size and power. With increasing utilization of these designs, it is critical that researchers understand the methodological issues, advantages, disadvantages, and related challenges.

PMID:
18956449
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2696315
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk