Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):950-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.950.

Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Author information

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Room J1B-215, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, the Netherlands. d.ubbink@amc.nl

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare effectiveness and costs of gauze-based vs occlusive, moist-environment dressing principles.

DESIGN:

Randomized clinical trial.

SETTING:

Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

PATIENTS:

Two hundred eighty-five hospitalized surgical patients with open wounds.

INTERVENTION:

Patients received occlusive (ie, foams, alginates, hydrogels, hydrocolloids, hydrofibers, or films) or gauze-based dressings until their wounds were completely healed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

Primary end points were complete wound healing, pain during dressing changes, and costs. Secondary end point was length of hospital stay.

RESULTS:

Time to complete wound healing did not differ significantly between occlusive (median, 66 days; interquartile range [IQR], 29-133 days) and gauze-based dressing groups (median, 45 days; IQR, 26-106 days; log-rank P = .31). Postoperative wounds (62% of the wounds included) healed significantly (P = .02) quicker using gauze dressings (median, 45 days; IQR, 22-93 days vs median, 72 days; IQR, 36-132 days). Median pain scores were low and similar in the occlusive (0.90; IQR, 0.29-2.34) and the gauze (0.64; IQR, 0.22-1.95) groups (P = .32). Daily costs of occlusive materials were significantly higher (occlusive, euro6.34 [US $9.95] vs gauze, euro1.85 [US $2.90]; P < .001), but nursing time costs per day were significantly higher when gauze was used (occlusive, euro1.28 [US $2.01] vs gauze, euro2.41 [US $3.78]; P < .001). Total cost for local wound care per patient per day during hospitalization was euro7.48 (US $11.74) in the occlusive group and euro3.98 (US $6.25) in the gauze-based group (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS:

The occlusive, moist-environment dressing principle in the clinical surgical setting does not lead to quicker wound healing or less pain than gauze dressings. The lower costs of less frequent dressing changes do not balance the higher costs of occlusive materials. Trial Registration trialregister.nl Identifier: 56264738.

Comment in

PMID:
18936373
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk