Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Oct 15;100(20):1432-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn326. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.

Author information

  • 1Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. mspepe@u.washington.edu

Abstract

Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case-control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed.

Comment in

PMID:
18840817
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2567415
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk