Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Oct 15;100(20):1432-8. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

    Pivotal evaluation of the accuracy of a biomarker used for classification or prediction: standards for study design.

    Source

    Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA. mspepe@u.washington.edu

    Abstract

    Research methods for biomarker evaluation lag behind those for evaluating therapeutic treatments. Although a phased approach to development of biomarkers exists and guidelines are available for reporting study results, a coherent and comprehensive set of guidelines for study design has not been delineated. We describe a nested case-control study design that involves prospective collection of specimens before outcome ascertainment from a study cohort that is relevant to the clinical application. The biomarker is assayed in a blinded fashion on specimens from randomly selected case patients and control subjects in the study cohort. We separately describe aspects of the design that relate to the clinical context, biomarker performance criteria, the biomarker test, and study size. The design can be applied to studies of biomarkers intended for use in disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis. Common biases that pervade the biomarker research literature would be eliminated if these rigorous standards were followed.

    PMID:
    18840817
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID: PMC2567415
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Click here to read Click here to read

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk