Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Dec;5(12):754-5. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1368. Epub 2008 Oct 7.

Is an invasive interventional strategy of value in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes?

Author information

  • Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE 19718, USA. wweintraub@christianacare.org

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness can be a helpful indicator of therapeutic value and is an important consideration when determining whether to use an invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes. In an economic analysis using results from RITA 3, Henriksson et al. found that an invasive strategy was not cost-effective in patients with low-risk disease, but was cost-effective for patients with high-risk disease and of equivocal cost-effectiveness in patients with intermediate-risk disease. This finding is consistent with those of other studies, especially FRISC II and TACTICS-TIMI 18, which found an invasive strategy to be cost-effective in patients with biomarker-positive NSTE myocardial infarction. An invasive strategy should, therefore, be considered for treatment of patients with high-risk NSTE myocardial infarction. Although available data are not based on the latest technology, another trial in this area would be difficult to conduct and of questionable ethics.

PMID:
18838964
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk