Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):2014-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0802-y. Epub 2008 Sep 25.

Optimizing detection of major depression among patients with coronary artery disease using the patient health questionnaire: data from the heart and soul study.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, McGill University and Sir Mortimer B Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.



Clinical guidelines recommend depression screening in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), but how to accomplish this is unclear.


We evaluated the test characteristics of the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and a two-step screening approach (PHQ-2 then PHQ-9 if positive on PHQ-2), compared with the Computerized Diagnostic Interview Schedule (C-DIS) for major depression. We also evaluated a "PHQ diagnosis" of depression, requiring five of nine symptoms "more than half the days," compared with the C-DIS.


Cross-sectional study of 1,024 outpatients with CAD.


Two hundred twenty-four patients (22%) had current major depression. Optimal cutpoints were >or=2 for the PHQ-2 (82% sensitive, 79% specific) and >or=6 for the PHQ-9 (83% sensitive, 76% specific). The two-step screening approach was less sensitive (75%), but more specific (84%), than the PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 alone. The "PHQ diagnosis" had low sensitivity (28%), but high specificity (96%).


Cutpoints of >or=2 on the PHQ-2 and >or=6 on the PHQ-9 had similar test characteristics. A two-step approach using the PHQ-2 followed by the PHQ-9 was no better than either instrument alone. A "PHQ diagnosis" of depression had high specificity, but poor sensitivity.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk