Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Epidemiology. 2008 Nov;19(6):783-4; discussion 789-93. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318188442e.

ITT for observational data: worst of both worlds?

Author information

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Channing Laboratory, Harvard School of Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. mstampfer@hsph.harvard.edu

Abstract

Hernán et al reanalyzed Nurses' Health Study Data on hormone therapy and heart disease, to explore further the apparent discrepancy for those results compared with findings from the Women's Health Initiative Trial. Hernán et al concludes that differences in time since menopause remains the most plausible explanation for the different findings. Part of the analysis employs application of the "intention-to treat" principle to analyze the observational data. This commentary points out some of the weaknesses inherent in that approach, which combines a major limitation of observational studies-lack of randomization-with a common limitation of trials, imperfect adherence to the assigned treatment.

PMID:
18813017
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk