Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Conscious Cogn. 2009 Mar;18(1):342-50. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.08.001. Epub 2008 Sep 19.

Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism.

Author information

  • 1Department of Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Studies, Schreiner University, Kerrville, TX 78028, USA. adfeltz@schreiner.edu

Abstract

Recently, there has been an increased interest in folk intuitions about freedom and moral responsibility from both philosophers and psychologists. We aim to extend our understanding of folk intuitions about freedom and moral responsibility using an individual differences approach. Building off previous research suggesting that there are systematic differences in folks' philosophically relevant intuitions, we present new data indicating that the personality trait extraversion predicts, to a significant extent, those who have compatibilist versus incompatibilist intuitions. We argue that identifying groups of people who have specific and diverse intuitions about freedom and moral responsibility offers the possibility for theoretical advancement in philosophy and psychology, and may in part explain why some perennial philosophical debates have proven intractable.

Comment in

PMID:
18805023
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk