Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Urol Oncol. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):495-9.

    What is the best approach for screen-detected low volume cancers?--The case for observation.

    Source

    Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. Laurence.klotz@sunnybrook.ca

    Abstract

    The case for active surveillance as the optimal therapy for screen detected, low volume, low grade prostate cancer is presented. This is based on data from recent long term studies of conservative management, the prostate cancer prevention trial (PCPT), the Swedish trial of radical prostatectomy vs. observation, and several large Phase 2 trials of active surveillance. These studies indicate convincingly that (1) widespread screening results in a diagnosis of prostate cancer in many patients with clinical insignificant disease, (2) that these patients can be identified with reasonable accuracy, (3) that delayed intervention does not appear to put those patients who reclassify as higher risk over time at significant risk, and (4) that the psychological burden of surveillance is acceptable.

    PMID:
    18774462
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk