Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Aug 29;4(8):e1000092.

    The dynamic brain: from spiking neurons to neural masses and cortical fields.

    Source

    Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Technology, Computational Neuroscience, Barcelona, Spain. Gustavo.Deco@upf.edu

    Abstract

    The cortex is a complex system, characterized by its dynamics and architecture, which underlie many functions such as action, perception, learning, language, and cognition. Its structural architecture has been studied for more than a hundred years; however, its dynamics have been addressed much less thoroughly. In this paper, we review and integrate, in a unifying framework, a variety of computational approaches that have been used to characterize the dynamics of the cortex, as evidenced at different levels of measurement. Computational models at different space-time scales help us understand the fundamental mechanisms that underpin neural processes and relate these processes to neuroscience data. Modeling at the single neuron level is necessary because this is the level at which information is exchanged between the computing elements of the brain; the neurons. Mesoscopic models tell us how neural elements interact to yield emergent behavior at the level of microcolumns and cortical columns. Macroscopic models can inform us about whole brain dynamics and interactions between large-scale neural systems such as cortical regions, the thalamus, and brain stem. Each level of description relates uniquely to neuroscience data, from single-unit recordings, through local field potentials to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), electroencephalogram (EEG), and magnetoencephalogram (MEG). Models of the cortex can establish which types of large-scale neuronal networks can perform computations and characterize their emergent properties. Mean-field and related formulations of dynamics also play an essential and complementary role as forward models that can be inverted given empirical data. This makes dynamic models critical in integrating theory and experiments. We argue that elaborating principled and informed models is a prerequisite for grounding empirical neuroscience in a cogent theoretical framework, commensurate with the achievements in the physical sciences.

    PMID:
    18769680
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID: PMC2519166
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (20) Free text

    Figure 16
    Figure 5
    Figure 17
    Figure 12
    Figure 2
    Figure 15
    Figure 10
    Figure 18
    Figure 1
    Figure 7
    Figure 3
    Figure 11
    Figure 20
    Figure 19
    Figure 4
    Figure 9
    Figure 14
    Figure 21
    Figure 8
    Figure 13

      Supplemental Content

      Click here to read Click here to read

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk