Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring;1(2):56-60.

A Review of NICHD Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: The Importance of Speaking a Common Language When Describing Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Source

Maternal Fetal Medicine, Northwest Memorial Hospital Chicago, IL.

Abstract

Despite evidence demonstrating no neonatal benefit, the medicolegal climate in the United States requires obstetricians to integrate continuous intrapartum surveillance into their care of the pregnant laboring patient. The intent of this article is to familiarize the reader with the standardized, quantitative nomenclature recommended to describe intrapartum cardiotocography in order to reduce miscommunication among providers caring for the laboring patient.

PMID:: 18769667; [PubMed]
PMCID:: PMC2505172

Free PMC Article

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

PubMed Central

Supplemental Content

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

A Review of the Proceedings from the 2008 NICHD Workshop on Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: Update on Definitions, Interpretative Systems With Management Strategies, and Research Priorities in Relation to Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring. [Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008]
A Review of the Proceedings from the 2008 NICHD Workshop on Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: Update on Definitions, Interpretative Systems With Management Strategies, and Research Priorities in Relation to Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Robinson B, Nelson L. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Fall; 1(4):186-92.
Fetal health surveillance in labour. [J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002]
Fetal health surveillance in labour.
Liston R, Crane J, Hamilton E, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, McNamara H, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanie MJ, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Mar; 24(3):250-76; quiz 277-80.
Fetal health surveillance in labour. [J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002]
Fetal health surveillance in labour.
Liston R, Crane J, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, Milne K, Richardson B, Trépanier MJ, Fetal Health Surveillance Working Group. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Apr; 24(4):342-55.
Review Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury. [Obstet Gynecol. 2006]
Review Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
Graham EM, Petersen SM, Christo DK, Fox HE. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66.
Review Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor. [J Perinat Med. 1996]
Review Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor.
Saling E. J Perinat Med. 1996; 24(1):7-13.

See reviews... See all...

Cited by 1 PubMed Central article

A Review of the Proceedings from the 2008 NICHD Workshop on Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: Update on Definitions, Interpretative Systems With Management Strategies, and Research Priorities in Relation to Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring. [Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008]
A Review of the Proceedings from the 2008 NICHD Workshop on Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: Update on Definitions, Interpretative Systems With Management Strategies, and Research Priorities in Relation to Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Robinson B, Nelson L. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Fall; 1(4):186-92.

Related information

Related Citations
Calculated set of PubMed citations closely related to the selected article(s) retrieved using a word weight algorithm. Related articles are displayed in ranked order from most to least relevant, with the “linked from” citation displayed first.
References for this PMC Article
Citation referenced in PubMed article. Only valid for PubMed citations that are also in PMC.
Free in PMC
Free full text articles in PMC
Cited in PMC
Full-text articles in the PubMed Central Database that cite the current articles.

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

A Review of NICHD Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: The Importance...
A Review of NICHD Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: The Importance of Speaking a Common Language When Describing Electronic Fetal Monitoring.
Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Spring ;1(2):56-60.

PubMed
Are matrix metalloproteinases relevant therapeutic targets for prostate cancer b...
Are matrix metalloproteinases relevant therapeutic targets for prostate cancer bone metastasis?
Curr Oncol. 2008 Aug ;15(4):188-92.

PubMed
Impact and outcomes of an Iyengar yoga program in a cancer centre.
Impact and outcomes of an Iyengar yoga program in a cancer centre.
Curr Oncol. 2008 Aug ;15 Suppl 2:s109.es72-8.

PubMed
Mechanisms of hybrid oligomer formation in the pathogenesis of combined Alzheime...
Mechanisms of hybrid oligomer formation in the pathogenesis of combined Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases.
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 4 ;3(9):e3135.

PubMed
Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Ch...
Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.
J Perinat Educ. 2007 Fall ;16(4):9-14.

PubMed

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

PubMed

Result Filters

Display Settings:

Send to:

A Review of NICHD Standardized Nomenclature for Cardiotocography: The Importance of Speaking a Common Language When Describing Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

Source

Abstract

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Supplemental Content

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

Cited by 1 PubMed Central article

Related information

Recent activity

Simple NCBI Directory

Getting Started

Resources

Popular

Featured

NCBI Information