Sequence analyses of the Alphaproteobacteria suggest BamD (YfiO) has at least five TPR motifs and BamB (YfgL) could have a β-propeller structure. (a) BamD (YfiO) sequences from Alphaproteobacteria were analysed with three independent TPR prediction strategies (SMART, http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/; HHpred, http://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/hhpred; and TPRpred, http://toolkit.tuebingen.mpg.de/tprpred), revealing the presence of five TPR motifs in various Alphaproteobacteria, including Rickettsia, Caulobacter and Mesorhizobium. The TPR is a degenerate motif with very few strictly conserved positions – the position of the consensus residues G–Y–A–F–P are shown. Although TPR signatures are not clear in all BamD sequences (such as the one from Escherichia coli), clustalw aligns the BamD homologs readily and at least some of the key residues found in TPR motifs are evident in all species. The alignment corresponding to the first TPR motif (‘TPR1’) is shown. (b) BamB (YfgL) sequences from Alphaproteobacteria were analysed with SMART to determine the presence of seven or eight β-propeller motifs. Homology searching using HHpred suggests BamB from E. coli is most similar to proteins with an eight-bladed β-propeller fold. Each of the blades would interact via hydrophobic contacts (heavy black line) and the outer β-strand can make additional hydrogen bond contacts (red lines). BamB from E. coli can readily be modelled using six of the β-propeller structures in the Protein Data Bank (2AD6, 1YIQ, 1KB0, 1W6S, 1FLG and 1KV9) as template structures. The model structure of BamB is shown from two views. In this structural model the three mutations in BamB (L173, L175, and R176; the Cα atoms of each are highlighted as orange spheres), that cause defects for docking to the POTRA domains of BamA (Vuong et al., 2008), come together in one of the β-propeller motifs.