Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008 Nov;118(5):347-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2008.01257.x. Epub 2008 Aug 24.

Long-term antidepressant treatment in bipolar disorder: meta-analyses of benefits and risks.

Author information

  • 1Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA. nghaemi@tuftsmedicalcenter.org

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Long-term antidepressant (AD) treatment for depression in bipolar disorder (BPD) patients is highly prevalent, but its benefits and risks remain uncertain, encouraging this meta-analysis of available research.

METHOD:

We reviewed randomized controlled trials for BPD involving >or=6 months of treatment with AD +/- mood stabilizer (MS) vs. placebo +/- MS, using meta-analyses to compare reported risks of new depression vs. mania.

RESULTS:

In seven trials (350 BPD patients) involving 12 contrasts, long-term treatments that included ADs yielded 27% lower risk of new depression vs. MS-only or no treatment [pooled relative risk, RR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.55-0.97; number-needed-to-treat (NNT) = 11], but 72% greater risk for new mania [RR = 1.72; 95% CI 1.23-2.41; number-needed-to-harm (NNH) = 7]. Compared with giving an MS-alone, adding an AD yielded neither major protection from depression (RR = 0.84; 95% CI 0.56-1.27; NNT = 16) nor substantial increase in risk of mania (RR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.81-2.33; NNH = 16).

CONCLUSION:

Long-term adjunctive AD treatment was not superior to MS-alone in BPD, further encouraging reliance on MSs as the cornerstone of prophylaxis.

PMID:
18727689
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2718794
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing Icon for PubMed Central Icon for PubMed Central Icon for PubMed Health
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk