Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Biol Lett. 2008 Oct 23;4(5):585-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0254.

Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter.

Author information

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. olivier.broennimann@unil.ch

Abstract

The classical approach to predicting the geographical extent of species invasions consists of training models in the native range and projecting them in distinct, potentially invasible areas. However, recent studies have demonstrated that this approach could be hampered by a change of the realized climatic niche, allowing invasive species to spread into habitats in the invaded ranges that are climatically distinct from those occupied in the native range. We propose an alternative approach that involves fitting models with pooled data from all ranges. We show that this pooled approach improves prediction of the extent of invasion of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) in North America on models based solely on the European native range. Furthermore, it performs equally well on models based on the invaded range, while ensuring the inclusion of areas with similar climate to the European niche, where the species is likely to spread further. We then compare projections from these models for 2080 under a severe climate warming scenario. Projections from the pooled models show fewer areas of intermediate climatic suitability than projections from the native or invaded range models, suggesting a better consensus among modelling techniques and reduced uncertainty.

PMID:
18664415
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2610080
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk