Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Dose Response. 2006 Sep 27;4(3):169-90. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.06-102.Luckey.

Radiation hormesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Author information

  • Lawrence, KS, USA. tdl108@sunflower.com

Abstract

Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people who live in good health with high background radiation. The bad is the nonacceptance of radiation hormesis by the U. S. and most other governments; their linear no threshold (LNT) concept promulgates fear of all radiation and produces laws which have no basis in mammalian physiology. The LNT concept leads to poor health, unreasonable medicine and oppressed industries. The ugly is decades of deception by medical and radiation committees which refuse to consider valid evidence of radiation hormesis in cancer, other diseases, and health. Specific examples are provided for the good, the bad, and the ugly in radiation hormesis.

KEYWORDS:

BEIR VI; cancer; deception; health; radon; therapy

PMID:
18648595
[PubMed]
PMCID:
PMC2477686
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (7)Free text

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk