A, Dose-dependent effects of apigenin on breast cancer MCF7 cell growth. To determine growth rates in the presence of apigenin (Api), cells were plated in 96-well dishes (2,000 per well) in basal medium for the indicated times and cell numbers were determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-, diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Relative cell growth rates (drug vs. vehicle) are shown in the presence of the indicated doses of apigenin, (*, P<0.05), as compared with DMSO-treated controls, Student's t test. B, Dose-dependent effects of apigenin on E2-induced breast cancer cell growth. MCF7 cells were treated with E2 or combinations of E2 with the indicated concentrations of apigenin and cell numbers determined by MTT assay after treatment. Points, mean (n = 6); bars, SE. **, P<0.01, 10 μM Api+E2 compared with 10 nM E2 (control), Student's t test. C, D, Fulvestrant and OHT inhibit apigenin-induced breast cancer cell growth. MCF7 cells were treated with combinations of apigenin and various concentrations of fulvestrant (ICI) or OHT. Cell numbers were determined by MTT assay after treatment. Points, mean (n = 6); bars, SE. *, P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with DMSO treated controls, Student's t test. E, Dose-dependent effects of apigenin on MCF7, MCF7-F and MCF7-T cells and differential inhibitory effects of apigenin on growth of drug-sensitive and -resistant breast cancer cells. To determine growth rates in the presence of apigenin, MCF7, MCF7-T, and MCF7-F cells were plated in 96-well dishes (2,000 per well) in basal medium for the indicated times and cells treated with various doses of apigenin for 7 days. Cell numbers were then determined by MTT assay and relative cell growth rates (drug vs. vehicle) then determined. Points, mean (n = 6); bars, SE. *, P<0.05, **P<0.01, compared with DMSO treated controls, Student's t test. F, Differential expression of ERα, AIB1, PKA in drug-resistant breast cancer cell lines. ERα, AIB1 and PKA protein levels in MCF7, MCF7-F and MCF-T cells were determined by immunoblotting using specific antibodies. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Representative results of two independent experiments, each performed in duplicate, are shown.