Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Dec;61(12):1216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Jul 10.

An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation.

Author information

  • 1Freiburg Centre for Data Analysis and Modelling, Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany. jan.beyersmann@fdm.uni-freiburg.de

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Time-dependent bias occurs when future exposure status is analyzed as being known with start of observation. As this bias is common, we sought to determine whether it always leads to biased effect estimation. We also sought to determine the direction of the effect bias.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:

We derived an easy mathematical proof investigating the nature of time-dependent bias. We applied the general mathematical result to data from a prospective cohort study on the incidence of hospital infection in intensive care: Here, we investigated the effect of time-dependent hospital infection status on intensive care unit stay. The nature of time-dependent bias was also illustrated graphically.

RESULTS:

Biased effect estimation is a mathematically inevitable consequence of time-dependent bias, because the number of individuals at risk of exposure is distorted over the course of time. In case of a time-dependent exposure that prolongs time until the study endpoint, the prolonging effect will be overestimated.

CONCLUSION:

Because time-dependent bias inevitably leads to erroneous findings, it is a major concern that it is common in the clinical literature. Time-dependent bias can be avoided by proper hazard-based analyses.

PMID:
18619803
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk