Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Jul;50(7):746-57.

    The prevalence of psychological distress in employees and associated occupational risk factors.

    Source

    Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, Locked Bag 500, Richlands, Queensland 4077, Australia. michael_hilton@qcmhr.uq.edu.au

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE:

    There is limited occupational health industry data pertaining to 1) the prevalence of psychological distress in various employee subtypes and 2) risk factors for employee psychological distress.

    METHOD:

    The employees of 58 large public and private sector employers were invited to complete the Kessler 6 (K6) as part of the Health and Performance at Work Questionnaire. A K6 score of > or =13 was chosen to indicate high psychological distress.

    RESULTS:

    Data on 60,556 full-time employees indicate that 4.5% of employees have high psychological distress of which only 22% were in current treatment. Occupational risk factors identified include long working hours, sales staff and non-traditional gender roles.

    CONCLUSION:

    High psychological distress is pervasive across all employee subtypes and remains largely untreated. Risk factors identified will guide the targeting of mental health promotion, prevention and screening programs.

    PMID:
    18617830
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk