Effect of oligonucleotides targeting myosins IIA, IIB, and IIC on the localization of paxillin phosphorylated on Tyr118. The distribution of paxillin phosphorylated on Tyr118 was observed relative to F-actin and myosin IIA (A and B), myosin IIB (C and D), or myosin IIC (E and F) in Neuro-2A cells subsequent to 96-h exposure to either sense (A, C, and E) or antisense (B, D, and F) oligonucleotides targeting myosin IIA (A and B), myosin IIB (C and D), or myosin IIC (E and F). All images were obtained by confocal laser scanning microscopy and are from confocal slices taken within 2 μm of the substratum; this ensures inclusion of all structures associated with adhesion. Labeling strategies are described in Materials and Methods. In all images, myosins are violet (Alexa Fluor 633-labeled secondary) (a), paxillin phosphorylated on Tyr118 is green (FITC-labeled secondary) (b), and rhodamine-phalloidin F-actin is red (c) The merged image and bars are shown in d. Companion 40× Fluar N.A. 1.3 images to the 63× confocal images seen in A–F were used to quantify changes in fluorescence signal intensities. The resultant histograms of summed total intensities (see Materials and Methods for details), expressed as intensity per pixel, are seen in G. An ∼90% knockdown of myosin II immunofluorescence after 96-h exposure to the corresponding antisense oligonucleotide led also to attenuation of paxillin-phospho-Tyr118 immunofluorescence by 57% (myosin IIA antisense) and 68% (myosin IIC antisense), but this did not occur after myosin IIB antisense treatment. Although the error bars shown, generated automatically by our statistical software, are indicative, the intensity data were found not to be normally distributed; consequently, a Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess significance, as follows. Pairings displaying significant difference: myosin IIA (sense vs. myosin IIA antisense) W(z) = 2.86, n = 30, p = 0.0042 (2-tailed); myosin IIB (sense vs. myosin IIB antisense) W(z) = 2.37, n = 30, p = 0.0178 (2-tailed); myosin IIC (sense vs. myosin IIC antisense) W(z) = 3.77, n = 30, p = 0.002 (2-tailed); paxillin-phospho-Tyr118 (sense vs. myosin IIA antisense) W(z) = 3.25, n = 30, p = 0.0012 (2-tailed); and paxillin-phospho-Tyr118 (sense vs. myosin IIC antisense) W(z) = 2.93, n = 30, p = 0.0034 (2-tailed). Pairings displaying no significant difference: paxillin-phospho-Tyr118 (sense vs. myosin IIB antisense) W(z) = 0.83, n = 30, p = 0.41 (2-tailed); F-actin (sense vs. myosin IIA antisense) W(z) = 1.14, n = 30, p = 0.254 (2-tailed); F-actin (sense vs. myosin IIB antisense) W(z) = 0.68, n = 30, p = 0.497 (2-tailed); and F-actin (sense vs. myosin IIC antisense) W(z) = 0.03, n = 30, p = 0.976 (2-tailed).