Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Ann Med. 2008;40(7):524-41.

    Strengthening causal inference in cardiovascular epidemiology through Mendelian randomization.

    Source

    MRC Centre for Causal Analyses in Translational Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. george.davey-smith@bristol.ac.uk

    Abstract

    Observational studies have contributed in a major way to understanding modifiable determinants of cardiovascular disease risk, but several examples exist of factors that were identified in observational studies as potentially protecting against coronary heart disease, that in randomized controlled trials had no such effect. The likely reason for misleading findings from observational epidemiological studies is that associations are influenced by confounding, bias, and reverse causation--where disease influences a risk factor, rather than vice versa. Mendelian randomization utilizes genetic variants that serve as proxy measures for modifiable risk factors to allow estimation of the causal influence of the modifiable risk factor in question. We present examples of the use of the Mendelian randomization approach and discuss both the limitations and potentials of this strategy.

    PMID:
    18608114
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Informa Healthcare

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk