Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43(5):347-51. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.049403. Epub 2008 Jul 4.

Ten year follow-up study comparing conservative versus operative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A matched-pair analysis of high level athletes.

Author information

  • 1Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Orthopaedic Department, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. d.meuffels@erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare long term outcome of highly active patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated operatively versus non-operatively.

DESIGN:

We reviewed high level athletes with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture on either MRI or arthroscopic evaluation more than 10 years previously, who were treated conservatively. They were pair-matched with patients who had had an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patella-tendon-bone, with respect to age, gender and Tegner activity score before injury.

PARTICIPANTS:

In total 50 patients were pair-matched.

RESULTS:

We found no statistical difference between the patients treated conservatively or operatively with respect to osteoarthritis or meniscal lesions of the knee, as well as activity level, objective and subjective functional outcome. The patients who were treated operatively had a significantly better stability of the knee at examination.

CONCLUSION:

We conclude that the instability repair using a bone-patella-tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is a good knee stabilising operation. Both treatment options however show similar patient outcome at 10 year follow up.

PMID:
18603576
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk