Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jul;40(7 Suppl):S544-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c6651.

How many days was that? We're still not sure, but we're asking the question better!

Author information

  • 1Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. tbaranow@bcm.tmc.edu

Abstract

Unreliable measures limit the ability to detect relationships with other variables. Day-to-day variability in measurement is a source of unreliability. Studies vary substantially in numbers of days needed to reliably assess physical activity. The required numbers of days has probably been underestimated due to violations of the assumption of compound symmetry in using the intraclass correlation. Collecting many days of data become unfeasible in real-world situations. The current dilemma could be solved by adopting distribution correction techniques from nutrition or gaining more information on the measurement model with generalizability studies. This would partition the variance into sources of error that could be minimized. More precise estimates of numbers of days to reliably assess physical activity will likely vary by purpose of the study, type of instrument, and characteristics of the sample. This work remains to be done.

PMID:
18562972
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2739114
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk