Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):240-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091749.

Validity of diabetes self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative: comparison with medication inventories and fasting glucose measurements.

Author information

  • 1HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1524, USA, KarenL.Margolis@HealthPartners.Com

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Although diabetes is conveniently assessed by self-report, few validation studies have been performed. Therefore, we studied whether self-report of prevalent and incident diabetes in Women's Health Initiative (WHI) participants was concordant with other diagnostic evidence of diabetes.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING:

A total of 161 808 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 were enrolled at 40 clinical centers in the U.S. in 1993-1998 and followed prospectively. At baseline, prevalent medication treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of physician diagnosis and treatment with insulin or oral antidiabetic drugs. During followup, incident treated diabetes was defined as a self-report of a new physician diagnosis of diabetes treated with insulin or oral drugs. Diabetes self-reports were compared with medication inventories and fasting glucose levels at baseline and during follow-up.

RESULTS:

At baseline, self-reported treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 79% of clinical trial, and 77% of observational study participants. Self-reported incident treated diabetes was concordant with the medication inventory in 78% between baseline and Year 1 in the clinical trials, in 62% between Year 1 and Year 3 in the clinical trials, and in 72% between baseline and Year 3 in the observational study. Over similar periods, 99.9% of those who did not report treated diabetes had no oral antidiabetic drugs or insulin in the medication inventory. At baseline, about 3% not reporting diabetes had fasting glucose >126 mg/dl, and 88% of these subjects subsequently reported treated diabetes during 6.9 years of follow-up.

LIMITATIONS:

Incident self-reported diabetes treated by lifestyle alone was not determined in WHI. Medication inventories may have been incomplete and fasting glucose may have been lowered by treatment; therefore, concordance with self-reported treatment or fasting glucose > or = 126 may have been underestimated.

CONCLUSION:

In the WHI, self-reported prevalent and incident diabetes was consistent with medication inventories, and a high proportion of those with undiagnosed diabetes subsequently reported diabetes treatment. Self-reports of ;treated diabetes' are sufficiently accurate to allow use in epidemiologic studies.

PMID:
18559413
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2757268
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

Figure 1
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk