Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer;36(2):356-60, 214. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00280.x.

Research malpractice and the issue of incidental findings.

Author information

  • Sherman Silverstein Kohl Rose & Podolsky, Pennsauken, NJ, USA.

Abstract

Human subject research involving brain imaging is likely to reveal significant incidental findings of abnormal brain morphology. Because of this fact and because of the fiduciary relationship between researcher and subject, board-certified or board-eligible radiologists should review the scans to look for any abnormality, the scans should be conducted in accordance with standard medical practice for reviewing the clinical status of the whole brain, and the informed consent process should disclose the possibility that incidental findings may be revealed and what consequences will follow. In the event such findings are revealed, qualified physicians should explain to the subject the significance of the findings and the alternatives available.

PMID:
18547205
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk