A model for heterotrimeric G-protein function during C. elegans asymmetric cell division and functions of the GPA-16(it143) temperature-sensitive mutant at both the restrictive and permissive temperatures. A, this model, based on published data (7, 9, 10), assumes that Gα·GDP bound to GPR-1/2 is crucial for pulling force generation. In the wild type embryo, GOA-1·GDP and GPA-16·GDP interact with the GoLoco motif (“GL”) proteins GPR-1/2 at the cell cortex to mediate pulling forces. Gα·GDP/GPR-1/2 concentration is determined by an equilibrium between the levels of free Gα·GDP, the amount of free Gβγ, and the amount of Gα·GDP/Gβγ. For simplicity, we have omitted from this model other regulatory components that likely participate such as RIC-8 (10), RGS-7 (11), and LIN-5 (55). B, GPA-16(it143) is unstable at 25 °C and likely misfolds or has defects in tertiary structure. Loss of functional GPA-16(it143) prevents the formation of GPA-16·GDP/GPR-1/2, thereby decreasing pulling forces. Although not formally tested, it is possible that the loss of functional GPA-16(it143) protein may also lead to an increase in free Gβγ subunits, as illustrated here. This would increase the amount of GOA-1·GDP/Gβγ and consequently reduce the amount of GOA-1·GDP/GPR-1/2, thus decreasing pulling forces. C, GPA-16(it143) is stable at 16 °C and has lost the normal nucleotide-state dependence in its Gβγ and GoLoco motif interactions (denoted “GxP”; see Figs. 1E and 2 and Table 1). This leads to an increased amount of GPA-16/Gβγ, thereby reducing the amount of free Gβγ available for formation of GOA-1·GDP/Gβγ. The consequence of this is an increase in free GOA-1·GDP, a resultant increase in the amount of GOA-1·GDP/GPR-1/2, and thus increased pulling forces. (Although a strong nucleotide-independent interaction of GPA-16(it143) with Gβγ likely explains the observed phenotype at the permissive temperature, we cannot formally rule out that GPA-16(it143) alone (freed of Gβγ sequestration) may be competent for generating pulling forces. This notion is particularly interesting as GPA-16(it143) has appreciable, although nucleotide-state independent, binding to regulatory proteins such as RIC-8 and GPR-1/2. Thus, it is also possible that increased levels of GPA-16/GPR-1/2 at the permissive temperature may cause increased pulling forces.) D, loss of all GOA-1 protein by RNA interference prevents accumulation of GOA-1·GDP/GPR-1/2, thus decreasing pulling forces. Furthermore, increased amounts of free Gβγ sequesters the stable GPA-16(it143) mutant and prevents formation of GPA-16/GPR-1/2 complexes. Thus pulling forces are potentially reduced by two mechanisms.