Graphical representations of the relationships between translational changes and changes in the transcriptome. (A–C) Changes in ribosomal association following salt stress, calculated as [log2(FMS/FMN)](A), [log2(PS/PN)] (B), and (log2[(P/FM)S/(P/FM)N]) (C), were plotted against their respective changes in transcript levels (TS/TN). The best-fit linear trend lines are marked, and their slope and R 2 values are indicated. Dashed lines represent two standard deviations (2 SD) from the trend line. Genes that were tested by Northern analysis and disussed in the text are indicated by arrows. (D) A model explaining the inverse relationship between the global translational response and the transcriptome response. (Top) The translational status of three representative genes. For simplicity, at optimal growth conditions, five mRNA molecules of each gene are free of ribosomes (FM) and five are associated with translating ribosomes (P), thereby yielding a P/FM of one. (Middle) Following 1 h of high salinity stress, mRNA molecules are shifted from the P pool to the FM pool in an identical manner for all genes. (Bottom) Concomitant with the translational change or soon after, changes in mRNA transcript levels take place only within the FM fraction. For some genes, a fast degradation (left) occurs, leading to an apparent low P/FM. For other mRNAs (middle), no change occurs in transcript levels. Finally, transcription induced for some genes may lead to an increase in mRNA levels and a decrease in P/FM (right). Thus, although the shift from P to FM was similar to all genes, the changes in mRNA levels, which are reflected mainly in the FM fraction, lead to the apparent inverse correlation between changes in T and changes in P/FM.